Tejashwi Yadav’s “Bahari” and Mamata Banerjee’s “Bohiragata” rhetoric redefine regional politics by invoking the “outsider” tag. This analysis explores their shared strategy, political motives, and the wider impact on India’s democratic and electoral landscape ahead of key state elections.
In the evolving landscape of Indian politics, two regional leaders — Bihar’s Tejashwi Yadav and West Bengal’s Mamata Banerjee — have revived an old yet potent theme: the “outsider” debate. While the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader champions the slogan of “Bihari versus Bahari,” Mamata Banerjee of the Trinamool Congress (TMC) employs a similar rhetoric with her term “Bohiragata.” Both phrases translate to “outsider,” yet their political intentions and consequences differ in context and effect.
Though rooted in distinct regional cultures, these parallel narratives reveal a shared political strategy — invoking identity and local pride to counter the perceived dominance of national parties, particularly the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). However, this tactic also risks deepening political divisions and weakening democratic discourse.
Tejashwi’s ‘Bihari vs Bahari’ Campaign
Tejashwi Yadav’s emphasis on the “Bahari” narrative is a strategic countermeasure against the BJP’s influence in Bihar. As the son of former Chief Minister Lalu Prasad Yadav, Tejashwi faces a dual challenge — reclaiming RJD’s legacy while distancing himself from the shadow of the so-called “jungle raj” era. His rhetoric positions him as a proud local leader defending Bihar’s political self-determination against external interference.
By framing national BJP leaders as “outsiders,” Tejashwi seeks to reignite regional pride and question the relevance of politicians who visit the state only during elections. This local-versus-national narrative resonates strongly in rural Bihar, where voters often feel overlooked by the central leadership. Analysts see it as an identity-driven political manoeuvre designed to consolidate anti-BJP sentiment while masking governance shortcomings.
Mamata Banerjee’s ‘Bohiragata’ Politics
In West Bengal, Mamata Banerjee has long championed the “Bohiragata” or “outsider” narrative as a defensive wall against the BJP’s expanding presence. From labeling Congress leader Rahul Gandhi a “seasonal bird” to portraying BJP campaigners from other states as alien to Bengal’s culture, Mamata’s rhetoric reflects her assertion of Bengali identity and autonomy.
Her critics, however, point out the contradictions — TMC itself includes Members of Parliament from outside West Bengal. Moreover, under the Representation of the People Act, 1951, any eligible Indian citizen can contest elections in any state, barring a few exceptions like Sikkim, Assam, and Lakshadweep. Even national leaders such as Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Rahul Gandhi represent constituencies outside their home states, challenging the logic of the “outsider” label.
A Political Strategy of Identity and Resistance
Both Tejashwi and Mamata employ the “outsider” narrative as a symbolic defense mechanism. For Mamata, it deflects criticism of her governance and projects her as the protector of Bengal’s culture. For Tejashwi, it is a rallying cry against BJP’s central influence and an effort to re-establish RJD’s local dominance.
Their critics argue that such narratives divert attention from core governance issues, like unemployment, education, and development, and instead fuel emotional and identity-based politics. Yet, supporters claim that this is a necessary assertion of regional voice in an era of increasing centralisation under the NDA-led government.
National Implications and Electoral Impact
The “outsider” discourse gains particular significance when viewed against electoral data. In the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, the NDA secured about 45.5% of the vote share in Bihar, while the BJP bagged 38.7% in West Bengal, emerging as the principal opposition in both states. As a result, both Mamata and Tejashwi face the political necessity of narrative innovation to retain their regional foothold.
Interestingly, Tejashwi’s rhetoric reportedly gained traction during his opposition to the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in Bihar. Meanwhile, West Bengal is gearing up for assembly elections next year — a time when the “Bohiragata” narrative is expected to resurface with renewed intensity.
Beyond Rhetoric: The Democratic Cost
While effective in mobilisation, this political tactic risks undermining national unity by framing democratic competition in terms of cultural exclusion. The idea that only locals can represent a region contradicts the constitutional principle of pan-Indian representation. Nonetheless, both leaders have successfully leveraged this sentiment to polarise and energise their voter bases.
| Also Read: Senior Congress Leader Rahul Gandhi Launches Election Campaign |
Ultimately, the “Bahari” and “Bohiragata” narratives are not just about who belongs where — they are reflections of how India’s regional politics balances identity, power, and democracy in a country where local pride often becomes the loudest campaign weapon.
