Tripura witnesses massive protests after delivery boy Prasenjit Sarkar’s death. Public anger grows over delayed arrest, viral assault video, police inaction, and demands for immediate justice, accountability, and a transparent investigation by the state government.
Widespread public anger has erupted across Tripura following the tragic death of 23-year-old delivery boy Prasenjit Sarkar, who is alleged to have died by suicide after being publicly assaulted and humiliated at his workplace. The incident, which occurred in Dharmanagar under North Tripura district, has shaken the conscience of the state and triggered protests, with citizens demanding immediate arrests and swift justice.
Prasenjit Sarkar, a resident of the Kameswar area in Dharmanagar, was employed as a delivery executive with a private courier company, Blue Dart. According to allegations made by his family members and local residents, the young man was publicly assaulted by a woman identified as Sangita Bhattacharjee, a schoolteacher, over a delivery-related dispute. The alleged assault took place in full public view, further compounding the humiliation suffered by the victim.
What intensified the trauma, according to the family, was the circulation of a video of the incident on social media. The footage went viral within hours, exposing Prasenjit to widespread ridicule and social shaming. Locals allege that the viral video caused immense psychological distress and irreparable damage to his self-respect, eventually pushing him into a state of mental breakdown.
Unable to cope with the public humiliation and emotional trauma, Prasenjit allegedly took his own life. His death has left behind a grieving mother and family, now seeking justice amid mounting public outrage. Many residents have described the incident as a chilling example of how public violence and viral culture can destroy young lives.
Following the incident, large-scale protests erupted in Dharmanagar and gradually spread to other parts of Tripura. Protesters from various civil society groups, youth organizations, and local associations took to the streets, demanding the immediate arrest of all accused persons and exemplary punishment under the law. Demonstrators warned that any further delay would intensify agitation across the state.
Despite the gravity of the allegations and the widespread public reaction, police have not arrested the main accused even four days after the incident. This delay has drawn sharp criticism, with many questioning the efficiency, intent, and neutrality of law enforcement agencies. Protesters allege that selective silence by sections of the media and administrative inertia are contributing to the delay.
Adding to the controversy, a private school has reportedly removed the accused woman from her teaching responsibilities. While the institution stated that the decision was taken on ethical and humanitarian grounds, protesters argue that such administrative measures cannot replace criminal accountability. They maintain that only decisive legal action can restore public faith in justice.
Chief Minister Dr. Manik Saha addressed the issue through social media, assuring citizens that the Tripura government has taken the incident with utmost seriousness. He stated that a thorough, impartial, and transparent investigation has already been initiated and that justice will not be delayed.
“The administration is conducting the probe in a neutral manner to uncover the truth. Those found responsible will face appropriate legal action,” the Chief Minister said, reiterating the government’s commitment to justice for Prasenjit Sarkar and his family.
However, these assurances have failed to pacify public anger. Many citizens argue that statements without visible action offer little consolation, especially when no arrests have been made. The central question dominating public discourse remains unchanged: why has the accused not yet been brought under the ambit of the law?
Speculation and concern are growing over possible political patronage and selective application of the law. Protesters have warned that any perception of bias or delay could severely damage public trust in the legal system and governance.
State Minister Tinku Roy has also commented on the issue, stating that a detailed and unbiased investigation is underway. He emphasized that the government is deeply sensitive to the matter and will not tolerate injustice against honest, hardworking individuals. According to him, the administration remains vigilant to ensure accountability and swift justice.
Meanwhile, the incident has reignited debates on social degradation, mob behavior, and the dangerous consequences of viral video culture. Many have described Prasenjit Sarkar’s death as a tragic outcome of public shaming amplified by social media, calling for stricter action against such practices.
As Tripura watches closely, the demand from the streets is loud and unambiguous: immediate arrests, a fair and time-bound investigation, and justice for Prasenjit Sarkar without fear or favor. The coming days will be crucial in determining whether the assurances of the government translate into concrete action, or whether public anger escalates further in the face of continued delay.
