Delhi High Court dismisses urgency of PIL against “The Taj Story,” defending creative freedom and backing its October 31 release. The court calls the plea baseless, supporting director Tushar Amrish Goel’s research-driven portrayal of historical perspectives.
In a strong endorsement of creative expression, the Delhi High Court on Wednesday criticized a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking to halt or regulate the release of the upcoming film “The Taj Story.” The court refused to list the matter urgently, terming the petition an “unnecessary interference” in artistic freedom and expression.
The PIL, filed by advocate Shakeel Abbas and BJP leader Rajnish Singh, had urged the court to direct the Central government and the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to re-examine the movie’s certification. The petition alleged that “The Taj Story” distorts historical facts and could disrupt communal harmony, particularly in Agra, ahead of its nationwide release scheduled for October 31.
However, the Delhi High Court firmly declined to prioritize the hearing, stating that the plea lacked sufficient grounds for immediate intervention. According to a source quoted by IANS, the court observed that creative freedom cannot be curtailed without substantial justification and that every form of artistic work deserves space for expression unless proven harmful with credible evidence.
Court Backs Filmmakers, Defends Freedom of Expression
The court’s decision comes as a relief to the film’s makers, who had maintained that their work is rooted in research and respect for history. Director Tushar Amrish Goel, responding to the controversy, emphasized that “The Taj Story” is a product of extensive study and authentic references rather than mere speculation.
“The Taj Story is not built on imagination or hearsay,” Goel stated. “It is the result of six months of extensive research, consultations, and verified historical references. The CBFC reviewed every detail before certifying the film. Our intent was never to provoke or create division but to encourage informed discussion through a researched perspective.”
Goel further expressed gratitude towards the Delhi High Court for standing with the spirit of creative freedom, asserting that cinema must remain a platform for truth, research, and fearless storytelling.
Producers Denounce Allegations as Baseless
Producer CA Suresh Jha echoed Goel’s sentiments, calling the allegations and the PIL “completely baseless and politically motivated.” He clarified that the team’s goal was not to distort history but to reignite curiosity and dialogue about India’s cultural heritage.
“We made this film with full honesty and respect for history,” Jha said. “Our only aim is to bring the real story to the world—one that sparks curiosity and pride, not division. The film has undergone all due processes, and the CBFC’s approval is testament to our responsible approach.”
Petitioners’ Concerns and Legal Context
The petitioners had claimed that the film might misrepresent the historical facts surrounding the Taj Mahal, potentially triggering unrest among certain communities. They requested the inclusion of disclaimers and restrictions to prevent public misunderstanding. However, the court maintained that artistic interpretation cannot be restricted merely on apprehensions or unverified assumptions.
Legal experts note that the court’s stance reaffirms a consistent judicial approach in defending creative liberties. Unless a film is proven to intentionally promote enmity or misinformation, freedom of artistic expression remains constitutionally protected under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution.
About the Film
“The Taj Story” features a stellar cast including Paresh Rawal, Zakir Hussain, Amruta Khanvilkar, Sneha Wagh, and Namit Das. Directed by Tushar Amrish Goel and produced by CA Suresh Jha, the film is set to release nationwide on October 31.
The movie promises to offer a fresh, research-backed perspective on one of India’s most iconic monuments — the Taj Mahal — and aims to explore the lesser-known historical narratives surrounding its creation and legacy.
Creative Freedom vs. Censorship: The Larger Debate
The controversy surrounding “The Taj Story” reignites the broader debate over freedom of artistic expression versus historical sensitivity. Over the years, several films in India have faced similar challenges from groups alleging distortion or offense. However, the judiciary has repeatedly emphasized that cinema cannot be censored based on subjective sentiments.
| Also Read: Rishab Shetty thanks direction squad for Kantara: Chapter 1 success |
By refusing to entertain the PIL urgently, the Delhi High Court has once again reinforced the principle that art and cinema must be judged on merit, not on fear or speculation. The decision not only clears the path for the film’s release but also serves as a reminder that India’s creative community must be allowed the space to explore, question, and present alternate perspectives — responsibly and fearlessly.
