Political interference in MGNREGA implementation is undermining rural employment, transparency, and wage justice. Allegations of favouritism, unfair work allocation, and misuse of authority raise serious concerns over the credibility of India’s flagship rural employment scheme.
The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), envisioned as a lifeline for rural labourers by ensuring wage employment based on work output, is increasingly facing challenges due to political intervention at the grassroots level. In several villages, the implementation of MGNREGA has reportedly deviated from its core objective, raising serious concerns about transparency, fairness, and justice for actual workers.
Under the Act, payments are strictly linked to the quantity and quality of work performed by labourers. However, in practice, elected representatives at the panchayat level are allegedly attending worksites not as facilitators but as informal “directors,” issuing directions without participating in the physical labour. Disturbingly, the output generated by genuine workers is reportedly being shared with individuals who do not engage in work but are present at the site due to their political affiliation or proximity to local leaders.
This misuse of authority undermines the fundamental principle of MGNREGA, which prioritizes dignity of labour and equal opportunity for all rural workers. Labourers have expressed frustration that despite working long hours, their rightful wages are being diluted, while non-working individuals benefit unfairly. Such practices not only discourage hardworking labourers but also erode trust in public welfare schemes.
Another major concern is the existing choice system for allocating work under MGNREGA. Although the Act guarantees employment to all eligible applicants without discrimination, ground-level implementation reportedly follows political colour. Preference in work allocation is allegedly given to supporters or associates of local political figures, side-lining deserving workers. This politicization of job allocation contradicts the spirit of inclusiveness embedded in the legislation.
| Also Read: Congress accuses BJP–RSS of Religious Polarisation |
Alarmingly, a recent incident highlighting these irregularities has been reported from an area under the jurisdiction of the state’s Finance Minister. Sources allege that individuals close to the minister are exercising undue influence, showing partiality in providing work under MGNREGA. This has intensified public criticism, as the scheme is expected to function impartially, especially in constituencies represented by senior leaders.
Observers note that the state administration appears to be functioning under the directions of political personnel rather than strictly adhering to statutory guidelines. Labour rights activists and civil society groups are now urging appropriate authorities to intervene immediately. They demand a thorough review of the system, stricter monitoring, and accountability mechanisms to ensure that benefits reach actual workers.
| Also Read: TREDA wins SKOCH Silver for Transforming Tribal Electrification |
Experts emphasize that unless political interference is curtailed and the choice and payment systems are reformed, MGNREGA risks losing its credibility. Protecting the interests of the rural labour class, for whom the scheme was created, must remain the top priority.
