The World Bank has praised Tripura’s TRESP as one of the best-performing projects in Northeast India, highlighting progress in rural livelihoods, Producer Groups, village development, institutional strengthening, tribal development and field-level implementation across the state.
The World Bank has praised the Tripura Rural Economic Growth and Service Delivery Project (TRESP) as one of the best-performing World Bank-funded projects in Northeast India, recognising the progress achieved in rural livelihoods, institutional strengthening and community-led development across the state.
The observation came during a three-day World Bank review visit of TRESP, which began on Monday with a high-level review meeting at Pragna Bhawan in Agartala. The review meeting focused on the overall performance of the project, livelihood interventions, institutional strengthening and strategies for the next phase of implementation.
The meeting was chaired by TRESP Project Director Subhashis Das. World Bank Task Team Leader Preeti Kumar participated in the discussions along with Amit Arora, Souvik Mitra, Nilanjana Gupta, Kamlesh and other members of the World Bank team. Officials and representatives of stakeholder departments also took part in the review process.
During the meeting, World Bank Task Team Leader Preeti Kumar appreciated the progress made under TRESP and described the project as one of the best-performing World Bank-funded projects in Northeast India. She advised the project team and stakeholder departments to maintain the existing momentum and continue concentrating on effective implementation and delivery of project outcomes at the field level.
The review gave particular attention to the strengthening of Producer Groups (PGs), Viability Gap Funding (VGF), Cluster Level Federations (CLFs) and Community Managed Training Centres (CMTCs). Discussions focused on ensuring that Producer Groups move beyond their initial formation and develop into sustainable business entities capable of generating long-term economic opportunities for rural communities.
The meeting also discussed the need to improve market linkages for Producer Groups and enhance their access to working capital. Effective utilisation of Viability Gap Funding was another important area of discussion, with emphasis on ensuring that financial support contributes meaningfully to sustainable livelihood activities.
Progress made by Cluster Level Federations was also reviewed during the meeting. Officials discussed financial management, record maintenance, regular monitoring and capacity-building activities required to strengthen the functioning of CLFs. The role of Community Managed Training Centres was also examined, particularly their potential to serve as local knowledge and training hubs for rural communities.
The CMTCs are expected to play an important role in supporting women farmers and rural entrepreneurs by providing access to training, knowledge and capacity-building opportunities closer to their communities. Strengthening these institutions is therefore being considered an important component of the project’s broader livelihood and rural development strategy.
TRESP Project Director Subhashis Das highlighted three strategic areas that require continued attention — capacity building through SIPARD, participatory Village Development Plans (VDPs), and research-oriented activities related to tribal development.
He stressed the importance of strengthening training programmes for government officials through SIPARD so that implementation and service-delivery capacities can be improved, particularly in tribal areas. According to the project leadership, enhanced institutional capacity among officials can contribute to more effective implementation of development programmes at the grassroots level.
Another major focus was the preparation of Village Development Plans across all 23 TRESP operational blocks. The project also aims to develop and implement 23 Model VDPs. The participatory VDP process is intended to bring community priorities, local requirements and development needs into an integrated village-level planning framework.
The Project Director also underlined the importance of research-based activities on tribal development. Such research, he said, can generate evidence and provide valuable inputs for future planning, policy development and implementation of targeted interventions in tribal areas.
Following the state-level review, the World Bank team will move into the field as part of the three-day visit. From September 29, the team is scheduled to visit project sites across different Rural Development (RD) Blocks to assess the implementation of TRESP activities directly on the ground.
During the field visits, the World Bank team will interact with beneficiaries, Producer Groups, community institutions, field-level officials and other stakeholders. These interactions are expected to provide a clearer understanding of the progress of project activities and the experiences of communities involved in the programme.
The visiting team will also hold intensive review meetings with stakeholder departments. The discussions will cover sector-wise progress, implementation challenges, emerging outcomes and measures required to sustain and accelerate the project’s performance.
The ongoing review combines strategic assessment at the state level with field verification and direct interaction with beneficiaries and implementing agencies. The process is expected to provide an opportunity to identify areas requiring further strengthening and improve implementation across different sectors.
With the World Bank recognising TRESP among the better-performing World Bank-supported projects in Northeast India, the review has placed renewed emphasis on sustaining project momentum. The project continues to focus on strengthening rural livelihoods, community institutions, participatory village development, institutional capacity and sustainable tribal development in Tripura.
| Also Read: Tripura Govt initiative aims to make homes earthquake resilient |
The three-day review is expected to provide further direction for the implementation of TRESP and help strengthen its interventions at the grassroots level, particularly through improved livelihood opportunities, stronger community institutions and greater participation of rural communities in village-level development planning.
