24.2 C
State of Tripura
Tuesday, March 17, 2026

Tripura Finance Minister presents Rs 34,212.31 Cr Budget for FY 2026–27

Tripura Budget 2026–27 worth ₹34,212 crore presented...

Tripura CM Dr. Saha Launches 24 Advanced Emergency Ambulances

Tripura Chief Minister Manik Saha flags off...

BJP Targets All 28 Seats in Tripura ADC Elections: CM Saha

Tripura Chief Minister Manik Saha declares BJP’s...

Supreme Court stays defamation proceedings against India Today journalists

Tripura Net
Tripura Net
www.tripuranet.com is a daily news, news article, feature, public opinion, articles, photographs, videos etc –all in digital format- based website meant to disseminate unbiased information as far possible as accurate.

Must Read

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Monday stayed the order of the Karnataka High Court which refused to stay the criminal defamation proceedings against India Today group editor Aroon Purie and journalists Rajdeep Sardesai and Shiv Aroor over a sting operation aired by the media outlet in 2016 on an alleged cash-for-votes scam.

A bench comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala, and Justice Manoj Misra, while staying the defamation proceedings against the three journalists, sought the response of the Karnataka government.

The news published by India Today indicated that certain MPs in Karnataka were being bribed in exchange for votes ahead of the Rajya Sabha elections in 2016.

Former state legislator BR Patil, who was among the legislators accused of improprieties in the sting operation report, filed a criminal defamation case against Arun Poorie, Rajdeep Sardesai, and Shiv Aroor the same year.

In December 2023, the Karnataka High Court refused to stay the defamation proceedings against the senior journalists.

On December 18, High Court Judge R Nataraj passed his judgment, noting that the accused India Today show had telecast doctored graphics and made derogatory remarks against BR Patil.

The High Court concluded that the offense of making a false electronic record to harm the complainants reputation, which is punishable under Section 469 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), was made out.

These allegations required further investigation, the High Court had said but refused to quash the case.

The High Court order was challenged before the Supreme Court.

Senior Advocate Dr S Muralidhar appeared for all three journalists accused in the defamation case.

The Supreme Court, while staying the Defamation proceedings, sent a notice to the Karnataka Government and asked them to reply by July.

- Advertisement -
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img

Latest News

Indian Markets Trade Higher: Sensex Up 178 Points, Nifty Gains 54 Points

Benchmark domestic equity indices were trading over 0.2 per cent up in afternoon trade today. The Sensex...