14.1 C
State of Tripura
Tuesday, February 10, 2026

BJP Victory in ADC key to Peace and Tribal Devt: CM

Tripura Chief Minister Manik Saha says BJP...

Tripura CM calls for BJP-led govt in upcoming TTAADC polls

Tripura Chief Minister Manik Saha says peace...

Tripura CM hails Union Budget as roadmap for Viksit Bharat

Tripura Chief Minister Manik Saha says Union...

‘Be prepared for serious consequence’: Top medical body director’s remarks annoy Supreme Court

Tripura Net
Tripura Net
www.tripuranet.com is a daily news, news article, feature, public opinion, articles, photographs, videos etc –all in digital format- based website meant to disseminate unbiased information as far possible as accurate.

Must Read

New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court Tuesday observed that Patanjali Ayurved has made an improvement by mentioning its co-founder Ramdevs name in its apology over misleading advertisements.

There has been a marked improvement. There was only Patanjali earlier, now there are names. We appreciate that. They have understood, a bench of Justice Hima Kohli and Justice Ahsanuddin Amanulla said after examining the public apology issued by Patanjali Ayurved.

The top court asked Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna to file on record the original page of each newspaper in which the public apology was issued.

However, the bench also took stern exception to comments made by Indian Medical Association (IMA) President RV Asokan in an interview with the news agency PTI.

The remarks were flagged by Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi who represented Patanjali Ayurved in the court.

The bench asked Mukul Rohatgi to bring the IMA Directors interview with PTI on record and warned of more serious consequences.

Bring it on record. This will be more serious than what has been happening till now. Be prepared for more serious consequences, said Justice Amanullah.

You have not covered yourself with glory and how can you decide what the court will do, if this is correct, the bench told IMAs counsel.

In an interview with the PTI, the IMA President had said that it was unfortunate that the Supreme Court criticised the IMA and the practices of private doctors.

We sincerely believe they need to look at what was the material before them. They perhaps did not consider that this was not the issue that was before them in the court. It does not behove the Supreme Court to take a broadside against the medical profession of the country which after all sacrificed so many lives for the Covid war, V Asokan had said.

Asokan made the remark in response to a query about the Supreme Courts observation in its hearing on April 23 during which it pointed one finger at Patanjali and the remaining four on IMA.

- Advertisement -
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img

Latest News

Indian Shooters Add Two Gold medals, Gold Tally Touches 39 at Asian Championship

In shooting, Indian shooters added two more gold medals today, taking the country’s gold tally to 39...