CPIM has accused the Tripura Govt of police inaction amid rising political violence, questioning BJP’s ‘Sushashan’ claim. In a letter to CM Manik Saha, CPIM highlights multiple recent attacks on opposition members and urges immediate action to restore law and order in the state.
The political climate in Tripura has intensified sharply as the Communist Party of India (Marxist) [CPIM] accused the state administration, under Chief Minister Dr. Manik Saha, of turning a blind eye to increasing incidents of politically motivated violence. In a strongly worded letter, CPIM Politburo member and Leader of the Opposition, Jitendra Choudhury, urged the Chief Minister to take immediate steps to curb what he termed a “rising culture of impunity” for political attackers.
The CPIM’s criticism directly challenges the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) much-publicized slogan of “Sushashan” (Good Governance), suggesting that law and order are deteriorating across the state.
In the letter addressed to Dr. Saha, Choudhury alleged a disturbing trend of attacks targeting opposition leaders, supporters, and party infrastructure. More concerning, he claimed, is that many of these incidents occurred in full view of law enforcement officials who chose not to intervene.
“The Chief Minister’s recent statement endorsing a ‘free hand’ to the police raised hopes for swift and unbiased enforcement of law,” Choudhury wrote. “Instead, we are witnessing an unprecedented rise in political hooliganism, while police officers either stand by as mute spectators or aid the aggressors through deliberate inaction.”
Chronology of Alleged Political Attacks
Choudhury’s letter outlines several specific instances of political violence reported between June 17 and June 30, 2025, painting a picture of consistent targeting of opposition voices:
-
June 17, Bisalgarh: During a permitted CPIM meeting, over 20 motorbikes were vandalized, and several activists were assaulted allegedly by BJP Yuva Morcha members. Police reportedly remained inactive for over an hour despite being on the scene.
-
June 21, Udaipur: A public event organized by the Indian National Congress (INC) was disrupted, and former minister Sudip Roy Barman was allegedly assaulted in the presence of a heavy police contingent.
-
June 22: Homes of CPIM supporters in Jirania, Narsingarh, and Jogendranagar were ransacked due to their political affiliations. Police, despite being informed, reportedly did not act against the perpetrators.
-
June 24, Takarjala: A CPIM gathering was attacked by masked individuals allegedly affiliated with Tipra Motha. Despite prior police deployment, no timely intervention was made to control the violence.
-
June 29–30, Kakraban & Tulamura: Scheduled CPIM events were disrupted or forcibly abandoned due to violent interference. Choudhury described these as coordinated attacks carried out with the tacit support or “connivance” of local police.
Opposition Questions BJP’s ‘Good Governance’ Claims
Choudhury argued that the ruling party’s promotion of “Sushashan” stands in sharp contrast to the ground realities being experienced by opposition parties in the state. The phrase “free hand,” he said, has been misinterpreted dangerously—empowering political goons rather than the police.
“Instead of delivering justice, the state machinery seems to be encouraging lawlessness. This silence and complicity of the police are dismantling the democratic fabric of Tripura,” he stated.
He demanded that the Chief Minister initiate immediate and transparent corrective measures to ensure law enforcement functions impartially and without political bias. Failing this, he warned, public trust in the administration will erode further.
Wider Political Implications
The CPIM’s letter comes at a critical juncture as Tripura prepares for upcoming political events, including local body elections. Opposition parties now fear that unchecked political violence and administrative passivity could seriously compromise the democratic process.
| Also Read: Jitendra Chaudhury slams BJP: “Democracy being slaughtered in Tripura” |
Political observers note that this escalation is not merely a conflict between parties but a larger issue concerning the integrity of Tripura’s governance. With opposition leaders increasingly vocal and public sentiment simmering, the coming weeks will be crucial for the state’s political stability.
The ball is now in the government’s court. Whether Chief Minister Manik Saha takes tangible action to ensure rule of law or continues what the CPIM describes as a “policy of selective silence” will define the BJP’s commitment to democracy in Tripura.
